@Article{KukkonenYlSwBrLaSt:2018:DeClCh,
               author = "Kukkonen, Anna and Yl{\"a}-Anttila, Tuomas and Swarnakar, Pradip 
                         and Broadbent, Jeffrey and Lahsen, Myanna Hvid and Stoddarf, Mark 
                         C. J.",
          affiliation = "{University of Helsinki} and {University of Helsinki} and 
                         {ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management 
                         Gwalior} and {University of Minnesota} and {Instituto Nacional de 
                         Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Memorial University of 
                         Newfoundland}",
                title = "International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and 
                         domestication of global norms: debates on climate change in 
                         Canada, the US, Brazil, and India",
              journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
                 year = "2018",
               volume = "81",
                pages = "54--62",
                month = "mar.",
             keywords = "Climate policy, Advocacy coalition framework, Discourse network 
                         analysis, Domestication, International organizations, Global 
                         norms.",
             abstract = "National climate policies are shaped by international 
                         organizations (IOs) and global norms. Drawing from World Society 
                         Theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), we develop two 
                         related arguments: (1) one way in which IOs can influence national 
                         climate policy is through their engagement in mass-mediated 
                         national policy debates and (2) national organizations involved in 
                         the policy process may form advocacy coalitions to support or 
                         oppose the norms promoted by IOs. To examine the role of IOs in 
                         national policy debates and the coalitions that support and oppose 
                         them, we use discourse network analysis (DNA) on over 3500 
                         statements in 11 newspapers in Canada, the United States (US), 
                         Brazil, and India. We find that in the high-income countries that 
                         are high per capita emitters (Canada and the US), IOs are less 
                         central in the policy debates and the discourse network is 
                         strongly clustered into competing advocacy coalitions. In the 
                         lower-income countries that are low per capita emitters (Brazil 
                         and India), IOs are more central and the discourse network is less 
                         clustered. Relating these findings to earlier research, we suggest 
                         that the differences we find between high and low per capita 
                         emitters may be to some extent generalizable to the relevant 
                         country groups beyond our four cases.",
                  doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.008",
                  url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.008",
                 issn = "1462-9011",
             language = "en",
           targetfile = "kukkonen_international.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}